Today's Posts Follow Us On Twitter! TFL Members on Twitter  
Forum search: Advanced Search  
Navigation
Marketplace
  Members Login:
Lost password?
  Forum Statistics:
Forum Members: 24,254
Total Threads: 80,792
Total Posts: 566,471
There are 1377 users currently browsing (tf).
 
  Our Partners:
 
  TalkFreelance     Design and Development     Programming     Development Software and Tools :

Fireworks MX

Thread title: Fireworks MX
Closed Thread  
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >
    Thread tools Search this thread Display Modes  
07-31-2005, 07:52 AM
#1
Freakz is offline Freakz
Freakz's Avatar
Status: Junior Member
Join date: Jul 2005
Location: Utah
Expertise:
Software:
 
Posts: 73
iTrader: 0 / 0%
 

Freakz is on a distinguished road

  Old  Fireworks MX

It's fricken awesome. Why doesn't anyone use it?

07-31-2005, 07:58 AM
#2
Bennett is offline Bennett
Status: Narassist
Join date: May 2005
Location: USA
Expertise:
Software:
 
Posts: 4,469
iTrader: 32 / 100%
 

Bennett is on a distinguished road

Send a message via MSN to Bennett

  Old

It pales in comparision to Photoshop.

07-31-2005, 08:05 AM
#3
crash3903 is offline crash3903
Status: Member
Join date: Jul 2005
Location:
Expertise:
Software:
 
Posts: 156
iTrader: 0 / 0%
 

crash3903 is on a distinguished road

  Old


It pales in comparision to Photoshop.
Shame adobe own it now then

07-31-2005, 10:21 AM
#4
jono1 is offline jono1
jono1's Avatar
Status: Non-conformist
Join date: Jul 2005
Location: Canberra, Australia.
Expertise:
Software:
 
Posts: 1,172
iTrader: 0 / 0%
 

jono1 is on a distinguished road

  Old

It hardly pales. In the respect that it's designed for a completely different purpose (web graphics as opposed to general graphics editing) it is miles ahead of Photoshop.

Essentially, photoshop is a bitmap program with rudimentary vector capabilities. Fireworks is a vector program with decent bitmap capabilities.

it streamlines the whole process of making and slicing web layouts and produces much more efficient coding than Imageready ever could (not that I use that feature...since I've gone CSS I only use it for the graphics themselves)

Plus its a lot better value for money..

07-31-2005, 08:49 PM
#5
unlevel is offline unlevel
unlevel's Avatar
Status: Member
Join date: Jan 2005
Location:
Expertise:
Software:
 
Posts: 122
iTrader: 0 / 0%
 

unlevel is on a distinguished road

Send a message via MSN to unlevel

  Old

Originally Posted by Freakz
It's fricken awesome. Why doesn't anyone use it?
I DO use it! In fact, it's pretty much all I use.

EDIT: See the monkey (avatar) all paths drawn in Fireworks.

07-31-2005, 08:55 PM
#6
Bennett is offline Bennett
Status: Narassist
Join date: May 2005
Location: USA
Expertise:
Software:
 
Posts: 4,469
iTrader: 32 / 100%
 

Bennett is on a distinguished road

Send a message via MSN to Bennett

  Old

Originally Posted by jono1
It hardly pales. In the respect that it's designed for a completely different purpose (web graphics as opposed to general graphics editing) it is miles ahead of Photoshop.

Essentially, photoshop is a bitmap program with rudimentary vector capabilities. Fireworks is a vector program with decent bitmap capabilities.

it streamlines the whole process of making and slicing web layouts and produces much more efficient coding than Imageready ever could (not that I use that feature...since I've gone CSS I only use it for the graphics themselves)

Plus its a lot better value for money..
Photoshop is also miles ahead of it in bitmap capablities. Most designers do not require the work of the built in scripter, as well as, illustrator goes hand and hand with PS for vectoring(was well illustrator's vector features are by far past firework's.). I do suppose it's an ok choice if you are not familar with all the workings of a basic website.

07-31-2005, 10:14 PM
#7
Paul is offline Paul
Status: I love this place
Join date: Apr 2005
Location: Canada
Expertise:
Software:
 
Posts: 723
iTrader: 0 / 0%
 

Paul is on a distinguished road

  Old

True Bennett.

I had to use Fireworks in school for some course. I had been using photoshop for a few years already and fireworks just didn't measure up at all in my mind. I found it to be a weak program but probably a good one for beginners. (not saying whoever uses it is a beginner).

07-31-2005, 10:15 PM
#8
dasani is offline dasani
Status: Junior Member
Join date: Jul 2005
Location:
Expertise:
Software:
 
Posts: 70
iTrader: 0 / 0%
 

dasani is on a distinguished road

  Old

To me it comes down to personal preferance. You can create the same websites with both of them, just depends on how you use each program. I personally don't like the interface of fireworks.

08-01-2005, 01:14 AM
#9
unlevel is offline unlevel
unlevel's Avatar
Status: Member
Join date: Jan 2005
Location:
Expertise:
Software:
 
Posts: 122
iTrader: 0 / 0%
 

unlevel is on a distinguished road

Send a message via MSN to unlevel

  Old

Agreed, personal preference. I don't like the interface of Photoshop

08-01-2005, 02:01 AM
#10
Shawon is offline Shawon
Shawon's Avatar
Status: Request a custom title
Join date: Nov 2004
Location: New York City
Expertise:
Software:
 
Posts: 1,164
iTrader: 0 / 0%
 

Shawon is on a distinguished road

Send a message via AIM to Shawon Send a message via MSN to Shawon

  Old

Fireworks is a great program and i use it but u cant really compare it with PS as PS is more for bitmap and graphics and things and FW is more for vectors and things with shapes. FW handles shapes much better than PS imo. but its easier to handle layer styles in PS imo.

but overall both programs are awesome and hard to compare to each other.

Closed Thread  
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

  Posting Rules  
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump:
 
  Contains New Posts Forum Contains New Posts   Contains No New Posts Forum Contains No New Posts   A Closed Forum Forum is Closed