Today's Posts Follow Us On Twitter! TFL Members on Twitter  
Forum search: Advanced Search  
Navigation
Marketplace
  Members Login:
Lost password?
  Forum Statistics:
Forum Members: 24,254
Total Threads: 80,792
Total Posts: 566,471
There are 1143 users currently browsing (tf).
 
  Our Partners:
 
  TalkFreelance     TalkFreelance Information     Suggestions and Feedback :

Re: Don't get it..

Thread title: Re: Don't get it..
Reply    
    Thread tools Search this thread Display Modes  
12-21-2010, 12:22 AM
#1
JRayers is offline JRayers
JRayers's Avatar
Status: Member
Join date: Apr 2006
Location:
Expertise:
Software:
 
Posts: 377
iTrader: 4 / 100%
 

JRayers is on a distinguished road

  Old  Re: Don't get it..

While the way a certain member handled the matter was poor, I think it does bring up some issues with the marketplace. A 4 day system may reduce spam to a degree but is likely to lose the interest of many people, of which some might be valuable future contributors.

Perhaps an 'Apply for Marketplace Membership' button would be more sensible? Ask the user to explain why they want to be involved, and what their first post is going to be. It would take a moderator to approve any applications but that is without doubt the best way to decide whether or not an applicant could become a useful member..

Reply With Quote
12-21-2010, 01:03 AM
#2
Dan is offline Dan
Dan's Avatar
Status: Request a custom title
Join date: Feb 2005
Location:
Expertise:
Software:
 
Posts: 3,164
iTrader: 15 / 86%
 

Dan is an unknown quantity at this point

  Old

I think seperating job listings and the marketplace would be a good start. Jobs are what a freelancing community needs. (Not talking about those hire me threads btw.)

Have a sub-section where employers can easily recruit and what-not, I think the current setup is deemed too unprofessional to attract anyone worthwhile. http://jobboard.geekup.org/ does it well.

Reply With Quote
12-21-2010, 01:04 AM
#3
Village Genius is offline Village Genius
Village Genius's Avatar
Status: Geek
Join date: Apr 2006
Location: Denver, CO
Expertise: Software
Software: Chrome, Notepad++
 
Posts: 6,894
iTrader: 18 / 100%
 

Village Genius will become famous soon enough

  Old

I'm not staff but I had a lot to do with the four day rule when it was initially made so how I see the issue: All forums have restrictions, some as many as 14 days with a post requirement (digitalpoint), this is the only effective way to stop spam. If we were to have moderators approve everyone they would have to go by some sort of guideline, most likely time registered or useful post count. This would be time consuming and present no significant advantage over automated approval.

The reason we use a post count only method is because members would often join and post ten pointless posts to get access, often ten consecutive threads in a single forum. This was very spammy and had to stop. We still get it from time to time with the occasional dumbass who didn't read the rules but it was almost completely cut.

In this particular instance, the member clearly had no intent of actually partaking in the forum. He wanted to make his thread and leave. He is one of the types the rule was designed to prevent from coming in.

edit: Dan's suggestion makes a lot of sense. Perhaps we could have that and allow anyone to post in it, but only four day members to see it (with the exception of members seeing their own thread).

Reply With Quote
Reply    


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

  Posting Rules  
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump:
 
  Contains New Posts Forum Contains New Posts   Contains No New Posts Forum Contains No New Posts   A Closed Forum Forum is Closed