|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thread tools
Search this thread
Display Modes
|
|
09-24-2007, 03:24 AM
|
#41
|
Status: I love this place
Join date: Dec 2004
Location:
Expertise:
Software:
Posts: 688
|
I got an idea. Look at specs. Know what your looking at, and know what it means.
I dont even have to look at either choices and I can tell you the difference.
PC = Gaming, pure and simple. But it will run PS and what not..
Mac = Running programs such as Photoshop, easier on resources.
OSX = Nice, but does have its own bugs.
Vista = Piece of ****, dont even waste your time.
XP = Best choice.. its simple, its solid (For windows), and its not a resource hog (Well not as much as Vista.. =P)
GG.
|
|
09-24-2007, 04:16 AM
|
#42
|
Status: Request a custom title
Join date: Sep 2006
Location: TN
Expertise:
Software:
Posts: 1,204
|
NVM - I pretty much just said I love my Macbook. I suggest it, but you may want the Dell. Its all a matter of opinion.
|
|
09-24-2007, 04:42 AM
|
#43
|
Status: Request a custom title
Join date: May 2006
Location: Memphis, TN
Expertise: Fedex Marketing Director.
Software: Firefox.
Posts: 2,632
|
Originally Posted by blaineevans
I got an idea. Look at specs. Know what your looking at, and know what it means.
I dont even have to look at either choices and I can tell you the difference.
PC = Gaming, pure and simple. But it will run PS and what not..
Mac = Running programs such as Photoshop, easier on resources.
OSX = Nice, but does have its own bugs.
Vista = Piece of ****, dont even waste your time.
XP = Best choice.. its simple, its solid (For windows), and its not a resource hog (Well not as much as Vista.. =P)
GG.
|
Okay let me say this again, I would like to know someone that has personally used the m1330 i want to hear what they got to say, thanks for your breakdown though
|
|
09-24-2007, 11:27 AM
|
#44
|
Status: I love this place
Join date: Dec 2005
Location: US and A
Expertise:
Software:
Posts: 595
|
What do you need to know, I still have mine in the closet somewhere... It was pretty good for a Windows computer, but multi-tasking was horrid. If just opening PS, it'd take 10-15 seconds (possibly less, but not much). If opening iTunes, PS, and IE, PS wouldn't open near as fast.
Zack
|
|
09-24-2007, 01:03 PM
|
#45
|
Status: TFL Veteran
Join date: May 2005
Location: FL, USA
Expertise: Design
Software: Photoshop
Posts: 3,010
|
Originally Posted by Zack
What do you need to know, I still have mine in the closet somewhere... It was pretty good for a Windows computer, but multi-tasking was horrid. If just opening PS, it'd take 10-15 seconds (possibly less, but not much). If opening iTunes, PS, and IE, PS wouldn't open near as fast.
Zack
|
that had to be your ram or something cause i have the less better specs than the 1330 and mine seems to go ahead just fine with all that opening at the same time and takes even less than 15 seconds, give or take 10.
|
|
09-24-2007, 08:36 PM
|
#46
|
Status: I love this place
Join date: Dec 2005
Location: US and A
Expertise:
Software:
Posts: 595
|
Yea, I had full standard everything (I think it's a 512MB or 1GB RAM)
Zack
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
|