The Real IRAN

Yer it seems the leader is a bit crazy. The part i dont get is america claims they are enriching uranium to make nukes. But America has nukes ... it doesnt seem to make sense how they think they are only allowed nukes ???? If they are against Iran enriching uranium shouldnt they get rid of their own nukes and stop being hypocrites ???

america doesnt threaten to wipe out another country, we are honest that we have nukes, we dont sell them to terrorists and such. you really think we dont have enimies that want to kill is with a religous passion?

edit: and lets put it this way, irans leader doesnt have a clean record as far as weapon use goes either.

edit #2: and robson, can you list me with a few things that you dont like about bush? Im not gonna say he is perfect, but a useless hipocrate is a little far

Originally Posted by c_programmer america doesnt threaten to wipe out another country, we are honest that we have nukes, we dont sell them to terrorists and such. you really think we dont have enimies that want to kill is with a religous passion? edit: and lets put it this way, irans leader doesnt have a clean record as far as weapon use goes either. edit #2: and robson, can you list me with a few things that you dont like about bush? Im not gonna say he is perfect, but a useless hipocrate is a little far

what are you talking about ? Iran hasnt threatened to use it to wipe out other countries. Infact theyve said its just for scientific research, although i dont believe that im sure they are using it to make nukes as well, they havent said were gonna blow up america.

we liberated iraq, research who saddam was and what he did, we never said "we will wipe them off the face of the earth". 2 completely different things, dont even try to compare
I really didnt give a crap about politics until like 10 years ago, so I cant contest you on veitnam

Originally Posted by c_programmer we liberated iraq, research who saddam was and what he did, we never said "we will wipe them off the face of the earth". 2 completely different things, dont even try to compare I really didnt give a crap about politics until like 10 years ago, so I cant contest you on veitnam

stop taking it personally, im commenting on the government not the people. I know a lot of americans, and contray to what a lot of people belive theyre not all thick.

I think liberated is a bit far. Im not gonna argue with you on Saddam but i cant say the army did a great job in Iraq. Huge numbers of civilian casualties, i think the whole thing was operated badly. Thats not the troops fault neccesarily its the generals and commanders. Take looks of pictures before and after the iraq war. Then say its much better. Saddam was a horrible leader, yet i dont think it was worth it considering the amount of people who died on both sides of this war. Homes were destroyed as well.

If it helps think of it this way. Imagine Bush was dictating the country but it is still as it is today. Some people were killed for protesting. Then the Iraqi's come along and liberate america. They kill Bush, at the same time destroying hundreds of thousands of homes, killing millions of people (im comparing this to Iraq based on size), at the same time thousands of iraqi soldiers being killed. America ... Liberated, some how i dont see thats quite the picture.

Originally Posted by c_programmer you really think its only for reaserch? if so then why arent they being cooprative?

What are you talking about ??? I said

Originally Posted by netspeak although i dont believe that im sure they are using it to make nukes as well

Originally Posted by c_programmer we liberated iraq, research who saddam was and what he did, we never said "we will wipe them off the face of the earth". 2 completely different things, dont even try to compare I really didnt give a crap about politics until like 10 years ago, so I cant contest you on veitnam

if we're so on liberating countries, there is other countries that need to be liberated, like China and Cuba... why dont we go ahead and bomb china like we did Iraq? ... yah...

Originally Posted by LexDiamondLS if we're so on liberating countries, there is other countries that need to be liberated, like China and Cuba... why dont we go ahead and bomb china like we did Iraq? ... yah...

The honest truth ? Because they give a much better fight. Iraq had WW2 weapons for gods sake. China would kick america's arse, largest army in the world. Not to mention it would piss everyone off. Iraq was considered a piece of trash by a lot of people so not much fuss was made, well a lot was but nothing in comparison to China.

Lets not forget virtually all manufactured goods are made in China, if the chinese government was invaded by America. America would be digging their own grave.

Originally Posted by netspeak The honest truth ? Because they give a much better fight. Iraq had WW2 weapons for gods sake. China would kick america's arse, largest army in the world. Not to mention it would piss everyone off. Iraq was considered a piece of trash by a lot of people so not much fuss was made, well a lot was but nothing in comparison to China. Lets not forget virtually all manufactured goods are made in China, if the chinese government was invaded by America. America would be digging their own grave.

you said it...

Originally Posted by LexDiamondLS you said it...

lol i think the armies guns are made in china too lmao.

what are you talking about ? Iran hasnt threatened to use it to wipe out other countries. Infact theyve said its just for scientific research, although i dont believe that im sure they are using it to make nukes as well, they havent said were gonna blow up america.

http://abcnews.go.com/International/...ory?id=1843031


you really think its only for reaserch? if so then why arent they being cooprative?

yep, bush = reincarnation of hitler

you obviously know nothing about hitler, to even compare them is madness.

In America TV can be bias, over here they can't. Our newspapers can be bias whilst their's can't.

all news sources are bias. BBC, fox, cnn, abc... the list goes on