Today's Posts Follow Us On Twitter! TFL Members on Twitter  
Forum search: Advanced Search  
Navigation
Marketplace
  Members Login:
Lost password?
  Forum Statistics:
Forum Members: 24,254
Total Threads: 80,792
Total Posts: 566,471
There are 1384 users currently browsing (tf).
 
  Our Partners:
 
  TalkFreelance     Design and Development     HTML/XHTML/DHTML/CSS :

Why You Shouldn't Be Using XHTML

Thread title: Why You Shouldn't Be Using XHTML
Closed Thread  
Page 3 of 3 < 1 2 3
    Thread tools Search this thread Display Modes  
11-22-2008, 11:41 PM
#21
HxC | Jeremy is offline HxC | Jeremy
Status: I'm new around here
Join date: Nov 2008
Location: CA, United States
Expertise:
Software:
 
Posts: 18
iTrader: 0 / 0%
 

HxC | Jeremy is on a distinguished road

Send a message via AIM to HxC | Jeremy

  Old

Interesting.

11-26-2008, 10:16 PM
#22
JamesW is offline JamesW
Status: Member
Join date: Mar 2006
Location: London, Ontario, Canada
Expertise: Design & Photograph
Software: Photoshop, Dreamweaver, Chrome
 
Posts: 182
iTrader: 1 / 100%
 

JamesW is on a distinguished road

Send a message via MSN to JamesW Send a message via Skype™ to JamesW

  Old

Originally Posted by rochow View Post
Nice plug



Not 1 thing you said is correct.

More reliable? False.
Stricter? False.
Better written? False.

XHTML is more reliable? Oh really, so my HTML is just going to one day just magically stop working while XHTML continues to keep working? Hardly.

Stricter syntax? No, different, not stricter.

Badly written markup? So if it's XHTML it's written well, and if it's HTML its therefore written bad? Please.

But hey, someones gotta live in fairyland.
Not one thing you said is correct lol.

HTML will stop working eventually

The syntax is stricter you do it wrong it doesn't work everywhere

And HTML can be wrote quite horribly, yours might not be but many are like really, not closing your tags where you should, thats a big no no

11-27-2008, 02:07 AM
#23
rochow is offline rochow
rochow's Avatar
Status: Member
Join date: Oct 2006
Location: Australia
Expertise:
Software:
 
Posts: 297
iTrader: 4 / 100%
 

rochow is on a distinguished road

Send a message via MSN to rochow Send a message via Skype™ to rochow

  Old

I will die eventually. Should I just give up now then? XHTML is no more future proof then HTML is.

The syntax is not any stricter. XHTML is just HTML 4.01 + XML. The reason closing tags are optional is to save space. If I removed my closing tags, it wouldn't make a difference because it's structured correctly. If someone had structured it incorrectly, it's going to be screwed whether they close the tags or not... so it doesn't make a difference.

XHTML has the big disadvantage that the most popular browsers in use can't read it, so they translate it into HTML, thus getting rid of any so-called advantages. So using XHTML gives you exactly zero advantages, unless you are using TRUE XHTML (not just delivered as HTML) and developing websites for jack-all of the population, in which case you should rethink why you are even in business if you're kissing a majority of potential customers goodbye.

Considering XHTML at this point in time is unusable from a commercial perspective, why people would think its better (given it has to be served as text/html anyway in order to be viewable by everyone) is beyond me.

11-27-2008, 03:42 AM
#24
AlexWind is offline AlexWind
Status: Member
Join date: Apr 2008
Location: Florida
Expertise:
Software:
 
Posts: 144
iTrader: 4 / 100%
 

AlexWind is on a distinguished road

Send a message via AIM to AlexWind Send a message via MSN to AlexWind Send a message via Yahoo to AlexWind

  Old

I think everybody needs to stop arguing over a few little tags and just use whatever they feel most comfortable with and adjust to new standards when they come out.

12-03-2008, 04:52 PM
#25
Jeroen G is offline Jeroen G
Status: Member
Join date: Nov 2006
Location: The Netherlands
Expertise: Website design
Software: Photoshop
 
Posts: 393
iTrader: 16 / 100%
 

Jeroen G is an unknown quantity at this point

  Old

The above poster is my hero, took the words right out of my mouth. Use your time to do something constructive people, jezus.

12-13-2008, 04:16 PM
#26
Indesicant is offline Indesicant
Indesicant's Avatar
Status: Junior Member
Join date: Apr 2007
Location: Denver, CO
Expertise:
Software:
 
Posts: 50
iTrader: 1 / 100%
 

Indesicant is on a distinguished road

Send a message via AIM to Indesicant Send a message via MSN to Indesicant Send a message via Yahoo to Indesicant Send a message via Skype™ to Indesicant

  Old

Very good article. I was already aware though of what XHTML was supposed to be used for. Whenever I learn a programming language, I tend to go further and figure out what that programming language was developed specifically to do over others, and why I should/shouldn't be using it. Originally, I learned how to use it, but didn't at first and stuck with HTML 4.01 Strict.. Then as XHTML picked up speed amongst developers, clients started requesting it..

One of things I have learned over the years, I don't try to convince too many of my clients that what they are requesting is wrong anymore. So, I just shut my mouth and do what makes them happiest. Lol

But yes, You are 100% correct on your article. Well done.

Closed Thread  
Page 3 of 3 < 1 2 3


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

  Posting Rules  
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump:
 
  Contains New Posts Forum Contains New Posts   Contains No New Posts Forum Contains No New Posts   A Closed Forum Forum is Closed