Do I Qualify for a Refund?

After the first time my sessionid was stored in a cookie... Might want to come up with something else.

To Jako, I'm sorry. It was a small lapse of judgement and I shouldn't have done it; however, I sent you $10 for the trouble and offered to fix the script myself. Was that not enough?

you posted several links to w w w . x x x . c o m which was not really needed with titles such as "hot sex" and other suggestive titles

it will be fixed tho...

EDIT: Its ok .Nick dont worry about it, and Jako until I get home please delete all the fraudulent entries from your DB so I can get to fixing it faster.

It's not Nick's fault that the script was designed and secured improperly. However everyone just needs to remember when dealing with such users in the future, that there is a risk for immaturity and malice behavior.

As for the refund, you deserve it unless he fixes it. However--alot of times, just because a new hack or exploit is found in a peice of purchased software, do you have the right to get a refund. I doubt microsoft would be in business if that was the case

wow...

I am just happy that atleast one of these crazy threads have been solved and handled in a more professional way.

you know what tho every code is insecure, so what makes you special to deserve a refund...

Originally Posted by Bennett It's not Nick's fault that the script was designed and secured improperly.

Didnt say it was, I also didnt say this was some awsome unhackable script lol. anyways Ill take care of it.

And to Rosem ? What are u talking about.

Honestly, I don’t think you deserve a refund.

If you bought a website running vbulletin and the next day someone hacked the website, you couldn’t go back to the previous owner and ask for a refund. It has got nothing to do with them, if someone else hacked the website it is no longer their problem.

I know this situation is slightly different because the script is custom coded but the same logic still applies. If someone has found a bug in the script which you paid for it is no longer the coder’s problem because it is no longer their website. Without a contract nothing can be done about it anyway.

Originally Posted by jon I know this situation is slightly different because the script is custom coded but the same logic still applies. If someone has found a bug in the script which you paid for it is no longer the coder’s problem because it is no longer their website. Without a contract nothing can be done about it anyway.

So when they make a verbal agreement saying that they will update the coding if something happens it should still apply.

I didn’t realise this was the case.

It is definitely un-ethical… but without a contract there still isn’t anything you can do about it.