Today's Posts Follow Us On Twitter! TFL Members on Twitter  
Forum search: Advanced Search  
Navigation
Marketplace
  Members Login:
Lost password?
  Forum Statistics:
Forum Members: 24,254
Total Threads: 80,792
Total Posts: 566,471
There are 600 users currently browsing (tf).
 
  Our Partners:
 
  TalkFreelance     Design and Development     HTML/XHTML/DHTML/CSS :

Are tables really dead?

Thread title: Are tables really dead?
Closed Thread  
Page 2 of 5 < 1 2 3 4 5 >
    Thread tools Search this thread Display Modes  
09-21-2007, 10:18 AM
#11
Alex Eyre is offline Alex Eyre
Alex Eyre's Avatar
Status: Designer
Join date: Aug 2006
Location: Manchester
Expertise:
Software:
 
Posts: 1,132
iTrader: 5 / 100%
 

Alex Eyre is on a distinguished road

Send a message via MSN to Alex Eyre

  Old

As said above, tables are NOT dead, i feel no line of code will ever become dead, as somewhere someone will need it.
Alex

09-21-2007, 11:17 AM
#12
Lamonte is offline Lamonte
Status: Member
Join date: Jul 2007
Location:
Expertise:
Software:
 
Posts: 125
iTrader: 0 / 0%
 

Lamonte is on a distinguished road

Send a message via MSN to Lamonte

  Old

Originally Posted by insub2 View Post
Why would I state it as an opinion when I believe it to be a fact? Perhaps the nuances of the thought are not expressed by that off the cuff statement. Thus, I have prepared a re-worded version that (hopefully) will communicate better: One who uses Tables for layout is producing un-semantic code. This may be because the coded has too much trouble producing a layout just using valid (X)HTML and CSS. Whatever the case, the result is excessive markup that adds no meaning to the document. This is a negative effect, and as such, the code should be considered "bad". Of course there or more negatives we could add to the list. Things like larger file size, difficult maintenance, lack of support for multiple devices, accessibility issues, and so on with the litany that I'm sure you've all heard about while listening to anybody preach the gospel of CSS.

And as long as we are re-wording here, perhaps you should instead say, "Just because I code with tables, does not make me a bad coder."
How can you believe it is fact with no scientific proof?

09-21-2007, 12:13 PM
#13
NuPixel is offline NuPixel
Status: rawr
Join date: Dec 2005
Location:
Expertise:
Software:
 
Posts: 1,238
iTrader: 0 / 0%
 

NuPixel is on a distinguished road

  Old

Originally Posted by insub2 View Post
Why would I state it as an opinion when I believe it to be a fact? Perhaps the nuances of the thought are not expressed by that off the cuff statement. Thus, I have prepared a re-worded version that (hopefully) will communicate better: One who uses Tables for layout is producing un-semantic code. This may be because the coded has too much trouble producing a layout just using valid (X)HTML and CSS. Whatever the case, the result is excessive markup that adds no meaning to the document. This is a negative effect, and as such, the code should be considered "bad". Of course there or more negatives we could add to the list. Things like larger file size, difficult maintenance, lack of support for multiple devices, accessibility issues, and so on with the litany that I'm sure you've all heard about while listening to anybody preach the gospel of CSS.

And as long as we are re-wording here, perhaps you should instead say, "Just because I code with tables, does not make me a bad coder."
You said you believe it to be fact. By the statement that you believe it makes it your own opinion, that does not make it fact in the whole scheme of things. Until you can prove that someone who codes with tables is a bad coder, then you should say that you feel those who code with tables are bad coders. Last I knew there was no rule in "HTML Coding" that sayd coding in tables is a bad thing. Those who say that are speaking from their own experience or opinion.

09-21-2007, 02:15 PM
#14
Haris is offline Haris
Status: Request a custom title
Join date: Dec 2005
Location:
Expertise:
Software:
 
Posts: 2,741
iTrader: 9 / 100%
 

Haris is on a distinguished road

  Old

Tables are dead for layouts. Tables will live forever for tabular data.

Tables for layouts is a choice of a bad a coder. Tables for tabular data is a choice of a good coder.

09-21-2007, 02:45 PM
#15
derek lapp is offline derek lapp
Status: design rockstar
Join date: Jan 2005
Location: guelph, ontario
Expertise:
Software:
 
Posts: 2,246
iTrader: 0 / 0%
 

derek lapp is on a distinguished road

  Old

blue is the choice of a good designer. orange is the choice of bad designer.

09-21-2007, 03:08 PM
#16
NuPixel is offline NuPixel
Status: rawr
Join date: Dec 2005
Location:
Expertise:
Software:
 
Posts: 1,238
iTrader: 0 / 0%
 

NuPixel is on a distinguished road

  Old

Originally Posted by derek lapp View Post
blue is the choice of a good designer. orange is the choice of bad designer.
Well you've got an orange signature, what's that say about you?

09-21-2007, 03:48 PM
#17
Salathe is offline Salathe
Salathe's Avatar
Status: Community Archaeologist
Join date: Jul 2004
Location: Scotland
Expertise: Software Development
Software: vim, PHP
 
Posts: 3,820
iTrader: 25 / 100%
 

Salathe will become famous soon enough

Send a message via MSN to Salathe

  Old

Originally Posted by halotree06 View Post
As said above, tables are NOT dead, i feel no line of code will ever become dead, as somewhere someone will need it.
Alex
<marquee><blink>o rly?</blink></marquee>

09-21-2007, 04:37 PM
#18
Haris is offline Haris
Status: Request a custom title
Join date: Dec 2005
Location:
Expertise:
Software:
 
Posts: 2,741
iTrader: 9 / 100%
 

Haris is on a distinguished road

  Old

Originally Posted by Salathe View Post
<marquee><blink>o rly?</blink></marquee>

Sarcastic code.

09-21-2007, 07:50 PM
#19
insub2 is offline insub2
Status: Member
Join date: Jun 2007
Location:
Expertise:
Software:
 
Posts: 136
iTrader: 1 / 100%
 

insub2 is on a distinguished road

Send a message via AIM to insub2

  Old

Originally Posted by Lamonte View Post
How can you believe it is fact with no scientific proof?
I gave a argument that consisted of both premise and conclusion. Each premise is testable. Therefore, my statement is, in fact, substantiated by scientific evidence.


Originally Posted by NuPixel View Post
You said you believe it to be fact. By the statement that you believe it makes it your own opinion, that does not make it fact in the whole scheme of things. Until you can prove that someone who codes with tables is a bad coder, then you should say that you feel those who code with tables are bad coders. Last I knew there was no rule in "HTML Coding" that sayd coding in tables is a bad thing. Those who say that are speaking from their own experience or opinion.
now we are just arguing semantics. ...and that is funny because it's ironic.

you see, if i am trying to convince another person that what i believe is a fact, i should not state "it is my opinion..." but, rather, simply state what i believe. it is obvious that what i am saying is something i believe.

as for the meat, using table for layout is bad practice. ...for all the reasons i have already stated.


Originally Posted by derek lapp View Post
blue is the choice of a good designer. orange is the choice of bad designer.
I like your joke.

09-21-2007, 08:02 PM
#20
nightshift is offline nightshift
Status: I'm new around here
Join date: Sep 2007
Location:
Expertise:
Software:
 
Posts: 11
iTrader: 0 / 0%
 

nightshift is on a distinguished road

  Old

In my opinion, tables are definitely not dead, but outdated.
All the <tr> and <td> make you crazy

Great for particular content, bad for website structure.

Closed Thread  
Page 2 of 5 < 1 2 3 4 5 >


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

  Posting Rules  
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump:
 
  Contains New Posts Forum Contains New Posts   Contains No New Posts Forum Contains No New Posts   A Closed Forum Forum is Closed