Today's Posts Follow Us On Twitter! TFL Members on Twitter  
Forum search: Advanced Search  
Navigation
Marketplace
  Members Login:
Lost password?
  Forum Statistics:
Forum Members: 24,254
Total Threads: 80,792
Total Posts: 566,471
There are 1425 users currently browsing (tf).
 
  Our Partners:
 
  TalkFreelance     Design and Development     Graphic Design, Multimedia and Photography :

web 2.0 (rant)

Thread title: web 2.0 (rant)
Closed Thread  
Page 3 of 3 < 1 2 3
    Thread tools Search this thread Display Modes  
06-30-2007, 06:56 PM
#21
Salathe is offline Salathe
Salathe's Avatar
Status: Community Archaeologist
Join date: Jul 2004
Location: Scotland
Expertise: Software Development
Software: vim, PHP
 
Posts: 3,820
iTrader: 25 / 100%
 

Salathe will become famous soon enough

Send a message via MSN to Salathe

  Old

Originally Posted by jon View Post
... but you can't argue that it's only recently that the style has become popular.
I can. Those styles of designs have been floating around 'CSS' galleries for years and years.

06-30-2007, 07:33 PM
#22
Awesome is offline Awesome
Awesome's Avatar
Status: Pastafarian
Join date: May 2006
Location: Duct Taped to your Ceiling
Expertise:
Software:
 
Posts: 3,440
iTrader: 26 / 93%
 

Awesome is on a distinguished road

  Old

Except that there hasn't even been css galleries for years and years, try 3ish years.

04 was when they first started popping up I believe.

06-30-2007, 08:24 PM
#23
Bazza` is offline Bazza`
Bazza`'s Avatar
Status: Request a custom title
Join date: Nov 2004
Location: England
Expertise:
Software:
 
Posts: 3,515
iTrader: 10 / 100%
 

Bazza` is on a distinguished road

  Old

The style of design that is often associated with "web2.0" has been around for a long time but Jon is right, that style has over past 2 years or so grown and grown in popularity especially since the bigger sites started using more simplistic designs.

07-09-2007, 08:11 PM
#24
Saulie is offline Saulie
Saulie's Avatar
Status: I love this place
Join date: Jul 2007
Location: London
Expertise:
Software:
 
Posts: 687
iTrader: 15 / 100%
 

Saulie is on a distinguished road

Send a message via MSN to Saulie Send a message via Skype™ to Saulie

  Old

Originally Posted by Village Idiot View Post
Care to explain what web 2.0 is then?

and web2.0 came around in '05
I thaught that it came around in 2004?
Edit: Sorry didn't see blueire posted same thign before me, didn't realise there was three pages =P

07-10-2007, 05:16 AM
#25
Digit is offline Digit
Digit's Avatar
Status: Just do it.
Join date: Sep 2005
Location: NY
Expertise:
Software:
 
Posts: 2,618
iTrader: 6 / 100%
 

Digit is on a distinguished road

Send a message via AIM to Digit Send a message via MSN to Digit

  Old

I'm sick and tired of people trying to define what "web 2.0" really is, saying it doesn't exist, or it does exist. It's simply a buzzword, and nothing more.

In my experience, here's what the word seems to be:

When the word "web 2.0" is used in a design sense, the person is usually referring to a simplistic and functional look.

When it's used in programming, it's mainly referring to Ajax or RoR.

When it's used in another sense, it's referring to the power of users controlling the site, as seen in social networking sites, or web apps.

But it's just a word that I wouldn't worry about.

07-10-2007, 01:26 PM
#26
derek lapp is offline derek lapp
Status: design rockstar
Join date: Jan 2005
Location: guelph, ontario
Expertise:
Software:
 
Posts: 2,246
iTrader: 0 / 0%
 

derek lapp is on a distinguished road

  Old

"web 2 designs" look like trash. period.

07-10-2007, 01:39 PM
#27
Choco is offline Choco
Status: Member
Join date: Jul 2007
Location: USA
Expertise:
Software:
 
Posts: 240
iTrader: 2 / 100%
 

Choco is on a distinguished road

Send a message via MSN to Choco

  Old

Web 2.0 is NOT ajax/RSS. Nor is it high-gloss, low-complexity designs. Web 2.0 is a movement in web development entailing high amounts of user interactivity with huge amounts of user-generated data. That is what web 2.0 is; no more. The things that people describe as web 2.0 are the things that came along with the movement.
The name of the movement, web 2.0, is probably causing the trouble itself...people think that they require new frontends to go along with the whole "Next Generation (2.0)" web backends.

Btw, this is when web 2.0 was thought of, and then implemented at a different date:
Originally Posted by Wikipedia
Web 2.0, a phrase coined by O'Reilly Media in 2003[1] and popularized by the first Web 2.0 conference in 2004[2] , refers to a perceived second generation of web-based communities and hosted services — such as social-networking sites, wikis and folksonomies — which facilitate collaboration and sharing between users. O'Reilly Media titled a series of conferences around the phrase, and it has since become widely adopted.

Closed Thread  
Page 3 of 3 < 1 2 3


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

  Posting Rules  
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump:
 
  Contains New Posts Forum Contains New Posts   Contains No New Posts Forum Contains No New Posts   A Closed Forum Forum is Closed