|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thread tools
Search this thread
Display Modes
|
|
12-28-2005, 08:54 AM
|
#1
|
Status: Member
Join date: Oct 2005
Location: San Jose, CA
Expertise:
Software:
Posts: 433
|
Y2038
|
|
12-28-2005, 09:17 AM
|
#2
|
Status: Member
Join date: Aug 2005
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Expertise:
Software:
Posts: 419
|
It is an interesting read.
Although you do have to remember that is a good 30 years from now, and most of the technology that we use will be dead by then. There will be 64 bit computers or 128 or what ever they move up to.
but then again, if we remember the Y2K bug nothing really happened so as long as people get onto it quick enough we should all be ok.
|
|
12-28-2005, 11:25 AM
|
#3
|
Status: Lurker
Join date: Jul 2004
Location: the Netherlands
Expertise:
Software:
Posts: 1,074
|
That's a long time from now, looks how far technology has improved over the last 10 years... it's still going at it in an exponential rate, do the math
I think think we should worry about it, everything will be different!
|
|
12-28-2005, 11:40 AM
|
#4
|
Status: Request a custom title
Join date: Jan 2005
Location: UK
Expertise:
Software:
Posts: 1,216
|
Very interesting read, although it is a fair while from now, if this is serious I can see it being resolved by then with the rate technology is increasing
|
|
12-28-2005, 10:28 PM
|
#5
|
Status: I love this place
Join date: Sep 2005
Location: Hull, UK
Expertise:
Software:
Posts: 683
|
Intresting Read. doesnt look like a likly bug but it could be one of those scares that everyone worries about!
|
|
12-28-2005, 11:08 PM
|
#6
|
Status: Member
Join date: Oct 2005
Location: Chicago, IL
Expertise:
Software:
Posts: 489
|
in 32 years digital clocks will be 64-bit, I dont think we will have much to worry about
|
|
12-28-2005, 11:27 PM
|
#7
|
Status: I love this place
Join date: Jan 2005
Location: UK, Birmingham
Expertise:
Software:
Posts: 606
|
Originally Posted by dan1088352
in 32 years digital clocks will be 64-bit, I dont think we will have much to worry about
|
They said the same about the Y2k bug but nothing happened, so I don't really see the point of it
|
|
12-28-2005, 11:37 PM
|
#8
|
Status: Lurker
Join date: Jul 2004
Location: the Netherlands
Expertise:
Software:
Posts: 1,074
|
Originally Posted by opserty
They said the same about the Y2k bug but nothing happened, so I don't really see the point of it
|
You're comparing 3 years against 30 years of awareness
|
|
12-28-2005, 11:38 PM
|
#9
|
Status: I love this place
Join date: Jan 2005
Location: UK, Birmingham
Expertise:
Software:
Posts: 606
|
Originally Posted by Aros
You're comparing 3 years against 30 years of awareness
|
All the more reason for it being pointless :P
|
|
12-28-2005, 11:45 PM
|
#10
|
Status: Online
Join date: Nov 2005
Location: Brisbane, Auustraaaliiaaaa
Expertise:
Software:
Posts: 1,279
|
I am suprised it took them this long to find out about the bug. :S
Unless it has been circulating for a while but no one has annoucned it pubicly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
|