|
|
|
|
Thread title: World War III |
|
|
|
|
|
Thread tools
Search this thread
Display Modes
|
|
07-12-2006, 03:07 AM
|
#1
|
Status: Request a custom title
Join date: Dec 2005
Location: Colchester, UK
Expertise:
Software:
Posts: 4,625
|
World War III
I saw this article on Shoutwire, found it raaather interesting:
"“Those that ignore history are doomed to repeat it.”
Something bad is happening in Asia. North Korea is trying to provoke Japan, South Korea, America, and pretty much everyone else in the world with missile tests and fightin’ words. Japan is mulling a pre-emptive strike. Taiwan is now planning a ballistic missile test, and according to Chungshan Institute of Science and Technology, it has a range of 600 miles and accurate to half a meter. India tested a long range, nuclear-capable missile the other day. And today, there was a series of train bombings in Mumbai, India, killing nearly 150 at last count.
America has pledged it’s support for Taiwan, if fighting breaks out with China. We clearly would defend Japan and South Korea if they were attacked. India and Pakistan are both allies, but if it came down to choosing one or the other, we would likely side with India. North Korea is a dangerous enemy, and seems to be itching for a fight. We have economic interests with China, and vice versa, but who knows what either of us would do in a time of extreme tension and hostility.
Prior to World War I, there were arms races, alliances, and war that was certainly going to happen. However, it was supposed to just be a relatively minor war between Austria-Hungary and Serbia. But The Allies and Central Powers pledged their support to their respective sides, and a localized war ended up encompassing the entire globe, or at least the resources of it. Did it need to be this way? The Treaty of Versailles claimed it was all Germany’s fault. I fault ego and arrogance on all sides.
So here we are, a century after the arms buildup to WWI, and what do we see? An arms buildup in Asia, and everyone already declaring their support. Only this time, it’s involving many more countries, many more people, and weapons many times more destructive. We also see wars that are almost certain to happen. Taiwan and China. India and Pakistan. North Korea and South Korea and Japan. None of us are naïve to think any one of these conflicts would just involve those parties. America, Europe and others have declared their support, so if fighting were to break out, it’s certain WWIII would ensue. And if any one of these conflicts started, it wouldn’t take much for these other fights to begin.
It seems like a pretty bleak outlook. People have been saying there would be a war between America and China which would decide who the next superpower would be. What we’re witnessing now could be the beginning of such conflict.
Should we be doomed to have massive wars every 100 years, though? Can’t we use our heads and prevent it? Is Taiwan worth causing a war? Is Kashmir? Are nuclear weapons and far-reaching missiles worth it? Is ego worth it?
North Korea should spend its money on feeding the millions of starving citizens. India should continue to nurture its growing technology industry. Pakistan should work at democratization, and become a model not only for the Muslim world, but the entire world. China should realize it’s can’t continue on its path of oppression and restriction, and work on a positive and cooperative relationship with America. Who says we have to fight to be superpowers? Both our countries, and the world, would benefit from our working together. Friendly competition reaps better results than a hostile rivalry.
I’m not some peacenik crying out ‘Why can’t we all just get along?’ I’m saying that it is in nobody’s interest to start this war."
|
|
07-12-2006, 03:21 AM
|
#2
|
Status: We're all mad here
Join date: Aug 2005
Location: Missouri
Expertise: programming
Software: Notepad
Posts: 1,606
|
India tested a long range, nuclear-capable missile the other day.
|
Umm weren't they actually trying to launch the heaviest satellite ever from it's on soil into space? It was a 2.2 tons satellite and a failure.
Should we be doomed to have massive wars every 100 years, though?
|
I like this quote by Albert Einstein, "I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones."
I wouldn't mind taking a step back to sticks and stones, if I live through WW III
|
|
07-12-2006, 05:18 AM
|
#3
|
Status: Member
Join date: Apr 2005
Location: Finland - China
Expertise:
Software:
Posts: 415
|
Originally Posted by Impluo
Umm weren't they actually trying to launch the heaviest satellite ever into space? It was a 2 ton satellite and a failure.
|
http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&ne...nG=Search+News Notice the words 'missile' and 'nuclear' on a lot of the news.
Originally Posted by Impluo
I like this quote by Albert Einstein, "I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones."
|
Totally agree on this one.
|
|
07-12-2006, 06:07 AM
|
#4
|
Status: We're all mad here
Join date: Aug 2005
Location: Missouri
Expertise: programming
Software: Notepad
Posts: 1,606
|
|
|
07-12-2006, 06:13 AM
|
#5
|
Status: Member
Join date: Sep 2005
Location: Townsville, Australia
Expertise:
Software:
Posts: 475
|
some pple really do worry to much...
|
|
07-12-2006, 06:30 AM
|
#6
|
Status: Request a custom title
Join date: Jul 2005
Location:
Expertise:
Software:
Posts: 1,054
|
I love that Albert Einstien quote!
|
|
07-12-2006, 10:07 AM
|
#7
|
Status: I love this place
Join date: Jan 2005
Location:
Expertise:
Software:
Posts: 581
|
|
|
07-12-2006, 08:17 PM
|
#8
|
Status: I love this place
Join date: Dec 2004
Location:
Expertise:
Software:
Posts: 688
|
Originally Posted by ambience
some pple really do worry to much...
|
You live in Australia, of course your not worried. You guys havn't been seriously involved in a war since when? lol. No offense, Im just saying.
America unfortunetly is a very large target because we have this nack of getting ourselves into messes we shouldn't be involved in. Whether we help one side of a civil outbreak or another, at some point someone's going to disagree with us.
|
|
07-12-2006, 08:21 PM
|
#9
|
Status: Request a custom title
Join date: May 2006
Location: Memphis, TN
Expertise: Fedex Marketing Director.
Software: Firefox.
Posts: 2,632
|
IMO we havent ended the war that is going on now so i dont think there will be a world war 3.
they think that we are not ready because most of the military is over in iraq well they have another thing coming
|
|
07-12-2006, 09:12 PM
|
#10
|
Status: Member
Join date: Jan 2005
Location: Florida
Expertise:
Software:
Posts: 480
|
Originally Posted by blaineevans
You live in Australia, of course your not worried. You guys havn't been seriously involved in a war since when? lol. No offense, Im just saying.
America unfortunetly is a very large target because we have this nack of getting ourselves into messes we shouldn't be involved in. Whether we help one side of a civil outbreak or another, at some point someone's going to disagree with us.
|
Australia has been involved in war for a couple of years - they are helping the United States in Iraq...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
|