Originally Posted by Salathe I have a long response written up at home, unfortunately I've not been able to post it here yet but may do so soon. There are a number of issues with this article which misguide readers. Do you even use the word "semantic" anywhere?..

That's kinda what I was getting at. It seems to mislead a bit. Hopefully he'll revise it so the points he's intending to make become more clear, and good practices are outlined (as opposed to just mentioning bad practices).

It's a good article (good points), it just comes across slightly skewed.